Influences and Changes by D.L. Rosenberg - 2/19/17 As a teenager growing up in the Washington Heights section of Manhattan in the mid-nineteen fifties, I was taken by my cousin Ann, a concert pianist, to what was to make an indelible impression on my imagination. I did not understand it at the time but Brecht’s THREE PENNY OPERA at the Theatre de Lys on Christopher Street in Greenwich Village introduced me to a wondrous world of whores, thieves and corrupt politicians who certainly were not common characters on the polite drawing room stages of those days.
Marc Blitzstein’s text, Kurt Weiil’s music, Brecht, and what I later understood to be a magnificent performance by a woman named Lotte Lenya, in a small theatre with a shower curtain backdrop, simply became the most exciting thing I had ever seen. While I had been thrilled by the original production of OKLAHOMA on Broadway, this was “something else.” The eight-piece German ratskeller band, the thrilling words and music in the tongue-in-cheek satire and the messages sung directly to the audience by actors who stepped out of character showed me a new world of theatre. “What keeps a man alive? He lives on others.” The appreciation of Brecht’s vision underlied much of my work when I was able to join Gisela Bahr, the president of the international Brecht society, in bringing Walfriede Schmidt of the then Volksbuehne Theatre of East Berlin to star in Brecht’s GOOD WOMAN OF SETZUAN. It was an exciting opportunity to understand Brecht and to appreciate what the Theatre De Lys production had represented in my life. Some songs had been deemed too explicit for the cast recording, the first ever album of an Off-Broadway show, and in 2017 that seems incredible. Today’s theatre has the freedom to use any language, any subject to deal with the personal struggles of coping with life in a world where technology has outpaced humanity. The bawdy, burlesque then-shocking content today would obviously seem mild, naive. Yet it found a way to represent the challenges and struggles of life. Has today’s theatre found ways to reflect a social and political reality that often can seem brutal, ugly and hard? Finding depth and beauty in “the human experience” isn’t easy. Recently, sitting in the LA Fitness locker room, a colleague seemed to enjoy the piped-in music that was to me painful acid rock. I asked how one might enjoy the harsh, blaring overly loud clash of sound and he said, quite sincerely: “That’s what life is like.” Lady Gaga at the 2016 Grammys seemed to surrender her excellent background in music and dance and together with her backup singers and dancers engaged in Metallica’s chaotic un-choreographed, wild leaping, tripping, screaming, unintelligible, unhinged frenzy. What has changed? Have we given in to what is a reality: human communication replaced by social media? Meaningful relationships replaced by easy “hook ups”? A poetic use of language as a vehicle of understanding replaced by overused expressions such as “I am fucked up?” The success of the film and previously the staged play FENCES by August Wilson with Denzel Washington and Viola Davis attests to the worthiness of “old-fashioned” things like depth of characters struggling with what Arthur Miller called a search for dignity. The language, the capturing of poetic expression of the depth, the deep depth of someone searching for meaning in his or her life is not unexciting, is it? Changes that have happened in the sixty decades I have been looking at are reflected in some examples: Have body mics freed actors better to express inner struggles? Has mumbled prose replaced poetry in expressing the human struggle to understand the universe? Has technology’s expert depiction of the ugly, the violent, the graphic, made language unexciting ? Not to say that technology has not brought many changes. Does anyone remember when on a larger stage we needed to motivate an actor to cross to the flowers on the table because the mic was hidden there and he needed to be there to be heard? No one wants to go back to that. But have we lost something of those old days when now basic human struggling is overshadowed by commercially necessary fixes such as a cast few enough to fit in one van plus a stage manager? Have we lost the appreciation of something quiet and sincere because it is lost in the turmoil of contemporary life? Obviously there have been many significant developments. The Regional Theatre Movement is bringing live theatre to communities throughout the nation. Some argue that it is the real “National Theatre.” Equity has become more open to change. TCG facilitates communication among members. Higher education has seen many changes in performer, designer and technician training. U/RTA, KCACTF, NAST, ASTR, USITT, ITI, ATHE, NNPN are alive and functioning. Theory has opened up new ways to look at theatre history. The living theatre bubbles with energy as so much is striving to be inclusive. Look at any fundamental theatre textbook to see chapters devoted to new and exciting movements in the thriving diverse American cultural scene. The age-old argument continues about how/whether the arts will change in the future. Could I put on my haptic suit would I find in the new VR any arts equivalents to match the impact of cell phones, the internet or even the magic microwave oven? And will even the NEA and NEH survive in the political climate of 2017?* Not to be a dinosaur lost in a past ice age, do I need to shelve my classical training as an actor, as a scholar and as a lover of the live theatre? In many wonderful ways contemporary production has explored heights that were never before possible. Who would replace large screens and color for black and white? But words, language, poetry, and I am afraid “humanity” needs another chance. I value the ZOOT SUIT now sold out at the Mark Taper Forum in LA and the new Schenkkan BUILDING THE WALL at The Curious in Denver (and four other regional theatres). Can there be more of an appreciation of small stages, intimate closeness between audience and actor, quiet moments, deep thought, beautiful language, dignity portrayed, . . . ? And as if ironic, the Shakespeare Association of so very many American and British organizations is thriving and energetically exploring new creative approaches to producing Shakespeare for contemporary audiences. This is ironic because Shakespeare is taught less and less in both secondary and undergraduate classes. Greek classics have all but vanished from curricula as have offerings in Philosophy, Logic, Creative Writing, Poetry and even Cursive is gone. Take this as a plea for adapting to new ways of seeing humanity with all of its diversity without losing value from old approaches. Passion and truth have always been the goals of artistic vision. Dramatic writing and its reliance on language has always trumped baser forms of expression.
DR. DONALD L. ROSENBERG moved to California in 1999 and served as a Visiting Professor in the Theatre Department’s critical studies program at UCLA. He had taken Early Retirement from Miami University where he was former Chair of Theatre and Producing Director of the Summer Theatre. He is a member of Actor’s Equity Association and has performed regionally. He studied in London and Paris and guested at the Centro Universatario de Teatro in Mexico City, at the Dolobois European Center of Miami University in Luxembourg, and at the Prague Academy in the Czech Republic. He has served on the board of the National Theatre Conference and has been a member since 1982. He chaired the Planning and Development Committee of the American Theatre Association, chaired its Commission on Theatre Development, was a founding member of the Association for Theatre in Higher Education, and Chair of the Chief-Administrator’s Program of the University and College Theatre Association. At Miami Dr. Rosenberg chaired a series of national think tanks (often called the Oxford Accords) one of which resulted in “The Guidelines for Evaluating Teacher-Artists for Promotion and Tenure.” More recently he hosted a meeting of nine presidents of national theatre organizations who found significant opportunities for cooperation. Dr. Rosenberg translated with Ramon Layera THE IMPOSTOR (El gesticulador), by Mexican author Rodolof Usigli, and adapted and directed the American premiere. Rosenberg’s experience includes: work with the distinguished actress, Walfriede Schmitt, of the Volkesbuhne Theatre of the former GDR; production with Jan Zavarsky, the Slovakian scenographer; Frederick Reeder of the Cleveland Opera; and Rosalie Jones of the Daystar Company and the Institute of American Indian Art in Sante Fe. He has been advisor to the Curious Theatre in Denver. His Undergraduate and Master’s degrees are from Purdue University and his PhD is from the University of Iowa where Dr. Oscar Brockett was his Dissertation Advisor. He has been long been a supporter of the American College Theatre Festival and received the Kennedy Center Honorable Mention Awards for Directing and for Outstanding Performance Ensemble. BENNY SATO AMBUSH is Senior Distinguished Producing Director-In-Residence of Emerson Stage, and an acting/directing faculty member in the Department of Performing Arts of Boston's Emerson College. He is an Executive Committee member of the National Alliance of Acting Teachers, an Adjudicator for the American Association of Community Theatres, and a long time SDC professional director. He has directed numerous productions throughout the nation's professional regional theatres and has taught acting and directing at the BA, BFA and MFA level at numerous U.S. colleges and universities.
5 Comments
12/11/2017 01:37:46 am
Being a social influencer has its advantages and disadvantages. During the time when I was elected Student Council President by the majority of my colleagues, I used all my powers to help other people. But over time, I discovered that I have a lot of potentials in wielding the power as Student Council President. That is when the time that I utilized my power for my own consumption. I skipped classes, became rude to people I did not like, etc. I was the King of the School. Until eventually, I was stripped of my Presidency.
Reply
Dr. Kathleen R. Downs
5/22/2021 06:52:03 pm
It was my honor to have been taught, and guided, by Dr. Donald L. Rosenberg at Miami University. Thank you for the wonderful interview you did with him. It was so great to hear his voice again!
Reply
Maralyn Dossey Jabour
8/31/2021 12:34:13 am
My first encounter with Threepenny Opera was as assistant to Dr. Rosenberg in launching the Village Playhouse at Miami University in 1966. Seeing the production come together and the carpet rolled out to welcome our first audience was thrilling. i fairly danced across the campus lawns composing my own song about how a spark from Brecht was passed to Weill and on to all the artists who helped rekindle this wonderful musical in a little town in Ohio. I hope my gratitude for being a part of that venture might somehow reach Don Rosenberg along with all best wishes for his family.
Reply
Stanley samuelsen
3/6/2023 11:30:42 pm
I moved a few times and lost contact with you.Then I found this web page.Everything about me is new since last…..howyyWas1964&1965civil rights acts that opened a time box exposing the hideout for 125 years,of a Facist society daily doing their evil right in front of us without anyone noticing.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
LIVING LEGACIESCELEBRATING AND PRESERVING THE WISDOM OF OUR MEMBERS Categories
All
Archives
August 2021
|